Monsees & Mayer, P.C., is a member of a team of attorneys who successfully litigated and negotiated this triumph for public safety. Read below:

Important Clarifications on Tentative Remington Settlements

Houston, Tx, [December 6, 2014] — , On December 5, 2014, papers were filed seeking approval of a proposed settlement of two economic class-action lawsuits of certain Remington bolt-action centerfire firearms that contain either a Walker trigger mechanism, or a trigger mechanism which utilizes a “trigger connector.”

The filings triggered multiple news reports that mistakenly conveyed the proposed agreement in significant fashions that require immediate clarification.

1. These settlements are not recalls.

2. These settlements are not any admission that the products are defective or unsafe.

3. These settlements are an opportunity for any concerned consumers who have the Remington Model 700, Seven, Sportsman 78, 673, 710, 715, 770, 600, 660, XP-100, 721, 722 and 725 rifles with either a Walker trigger mechanism, or a trigger mechanism which utilizes a “trigger connector” to have Remington install a new trigger.

4. The trigger replacement program will not be in place until after court approval and full notice will go out at that time.
This culminates from extensive mediator supervised negotiations between lawyers for those concerned about the triggers and Remington, who while denying there is any cause for concern, always desires to ensure that its customers are satisfied with Remington products.

A joint press release should issue to better explain details of the proposed settlement.

For further information,

Contact: Tim Monsees at or learn about Monsees & Mayer’s efforts on this issue.

Sources: The Plaintiffs’ Legal Committee in the referenced suits.